- #Mac os framework is terrible mac#
- #Mac os framework is terrible crack#
- #Mac os framework is terrible windows#
Three years later, the headphone jack issue might be settled for many, but it’s still at least an occasional annoyance for all.
#Mac os framework is terrible crack#
In the years since, “courage” has become a snarky byword, a shorthand way to crack wise about Apple creating products that have compromises nobody asked for simply in the name of progress. The courage to move on and do something new that betters all of us. “It really comes down to one word: courage. That’s why I am hoping Apple will have the courage of its convictions and be willing to release a bunch of its own apps using this framework.Īs WWDC nears, I can’t stop thinking about Phil Schiller’s now-infamous line about removing the headphone jack on the iPhone 7 back in 2016. They should be based on hard-won, real-world use by tens or hundreds of thousands of users.
#Mac os framework is terrible mac#
Those practices shouldn’t be based on Apple’s best guess or its theories on how a Mac app should feel. When those iOS developers want to make a Mac app, they’re going to need some best practices to follow. There are plenty of companies that maintain an iOS app but have never bothered making a Mac app, and now they might. It would have the added benefit (for Apple, anyway) of getting a bunch of people to buy Mac apps from its App Store. If nothing else, iPad apps could save the Mac from memory- and processor-hogging Electron apps. I would say 80 percent of the time, I use my MacBook just like it’s a Chromebook. I also use a lot of web apps, which allow you to separate a browser tab into an “app” you can Cmd-Tab through.
He has found not only that it’s easy to port an iOS app to the Mac, but also that it might be easier than you think to make that app feel Mac-like. Just take a perusal through some of the experiments from Steve Troughton-Smith has posted on Twitter. I’m also hopeful (perhaps naively so) that this new Mac framework will be powerful and flexible enough for many different kinds of apps. The best way to avoid that kind of confusion is to be clear and decisive from the start. Now, even Microsoft might not be very committed to them anymore. Worst of all, UWP saw very little adoption as developers stuck with the old way of making apps. It took the company nearly half a decade just to decide what to call them.
#Mac os framework is terrible windows#
Called the “Universal Windows Platform,” it has been fraught with changes in direction and complaints that it was too limiting. I worry that Apple could find itself facing an analogous (though not parallel) quandary to what Microsoft has faced with its own next-generation Windows app framework. Even if these apps are released in a beta, side by side with existing apps, that would be better than not updating them as soon as possible. It will increase the pressure in a way that an internal private beta never would. I also think Apple should do this development in public, with lots of regular people using them and submitting bug reports on them. Apple should just go for it, sooner rather than later, and ideally right now. I think Apple should go all in and make nearly all of its consumer Mac apps with the new UIKit / Marzipan frameworks, including Mail, Notes, Messages, FaceTime, Photos, Reminders, and Calendar. In fact, I think Apple should do more than double down on these iPad-style apps on the Mac. In our Mojave review, Jake Kastrenakes called them “ half-baked.” John Gruber has described them as “ terrible,” “ totally shitty,” and “ dreadfully bad.” In a post detailing many of the reasons why these apps stink, Benjamin Mayo writes, “These are mediocre, bordering on bad, experiences.” There’s no support for multiple windows, weird resizing bugs, thin keyboard shortcut support, and a look and feel that clearly is designed for touch instead of a mouse. It doesn’t take much to see why: just open up the Home app, Stocks, Voice Memos, or Apple News app in macOS Mojave, and you’ll see that these apps are un-Mac-like in ways almost too numerous to count. The current state of Marzipan apps has caused no small amount of consternation among many in the Mac community. That’s because they can’t get much worse. It’s expected to be much more ambitious than what we’ve seen before, and we may discover that these apps, built with iOS’s UIKit framework instead of the traditional MacOS AppKit framework, can be much more elegant and Mac-like than they are right now.
The project is codenamed “Marzipan,” and this year, we’ll see exactly how it’ll work for developers. This year at its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC), Apple is widely expected to expand the program for bringing iPad apps to the Mac, a “multiyear” project it kicked off last year.
0 kommentar(er)
